agentreadme

Report · marked 25 Aug 2026

doocs/leetcode

An agent will struggle here, mostly for fixable reasons.

Java · 36,506 stars · 35,870 files · branch main

Fix these first

01
Tests exist
This is the single highest-leverage change on this page. Agents don't need full coverage, they need one command that goes red when they break something. Even a handful of tests on the core path converts blind editing into a feedback loop.
02
Test command is discoverable
Add a `test` script or a `test` target that runs the whole suite with no arguments. The convention is the interface — an agent tries `npm test` and `make test` before it tries reading your CI config.
03
Instruction quality
Worth fixing: it's under 200 characters, which is closer to a placeholder than instructions; it never states a build, test, or run command; has no headings to structure it; has no code blocks.

The full marking

Every deduction below names the file or setting it came from.

Instructions 14/27 C+

Whether the repo tells an agent how to behave before it starts guessing.

Agent instruction file 12/12
AGENTS.md is present, which is the format the most tools read.
Also found: CLAUDE.md
Instruction quality 0/12
Present but too thin to change an agent's behavior.
Worth fixing: it's under 200 characters, which is closer to a placeholder than instructions; it never states a build, test, or run command; has no headings to structure it; has no code blocks.
README as an entry point 2/3
README exists but never explains how to get the thing running.
Give the README an Install and a Usage heading with real commands under each. Agents pattern-match on those headings.
Setup 11/20 B-

Whether an agent can install the project and get it running without a human.

Deterministic install 3/6
Only requirements.txt, which pins loosely at best.
Commit the lockfile your package manager generates. Without it, an agent's install and your install are different builds, and 'works on my machine' becomes unfalsifiable.
Discoverable commands 6/6
Commands are declared where an agent will look for them.
package.json scripts (postinstall, prepare)
Environment config 0/4
Nothing documents the environment this needs. An agent will get a runtime error it can't diagnose.
Add a .env.example listing every variable with a safe placeholder value. It's the cheapest possible fix and it unblocks the whole first run.
Pinned runtime version 0/2
No pinned runtime version.
Add a .nvmrc, .python-version, or equivalent so the agent's toolchain matches yours.
Reproducible environment 2/2
dockerfile gives a known-good environment.
Verification loop 4/22 F

Whether an agent can check its own work. This is the category that most decides whether agent output is trustworthy.

Tests exist 0/8
No test files found. An agent has no way to know whether its change broke anything.
This is the single highest-leverage change on this page. Agents don't need full coverage, they need one command that goes red when they break something. Even a handful of tests on the core path converts blind editing into a feedback loop.
Test command is discoverable 0/7
There's no obvious way to run the tests. Even if tests exist, an agent won't reliably find the entry point.
Add a `test` script or a `test` target that runs the whole suite with no arguments. The convention is the interface — an agent tries `npm test` and `make test` before it tries reading your CI config.
Continuous integration 4/4
9 GitHub Actions workflows define what "passing" means.
Lint and format rules 0/3
No linter or formatter config. Style is tribal knowledge, so agent output will drift from yours.
A formatter config is the cheapest way to stop reviewing whitespace in agent diffs. It moves style from opinion to a command.
Static type checking n/a
Not applicable — the Java compiler type checks every build.
Context economy 13/20 B

Whether the repo fits in a context window, or fights it.

No committed build output 6/6
No generated directories committed.
.gitignore hygiene 3/3
.gitignore covers 19 patterns.
File sizes fit in context 4/6
1 source file is over 100KB.
A single file that fills the context window forces an agent to work from fragments, and it will confidently edit code it never saw. Splitting the worst offenders pays for itself immediately.
lcp/main.py — 117KB
Repository weight 0/5
About 815MB checked out. Large enough that cloning and searching are both slow.
Large binaries and vendored trees slow every operation an agent performs. Git LFS or a separate assets repo keeps the working tree navigable.

Here is your AGENTS.md

Drafted from what is actually in this repository: the install command from your lockfile, the commands you already declare, your real directory layout. Anything marked TODO needs a person. Save it at the root as AGENTS.md.

AGENTS.md — drafted for doocs/leetcode
# AGENTS.md

🔥LeetCode solutions in any programming language | 多种编程语言实现 LeetCode、《剑指 Offer(第 2 版)》、《程序员面试金典(第 6 版)》题解

## Setup

```
pip install -r requirements.txt
```

## Commands

```
python postinstall
python prepare
```

## Layout

- `solution/` 22162 source files
- `lcof2/`    862 source files
- `lcci/`     787 source files
- `lcof/`     769 source files
- `lcp/`      253 source files
- `basic/`    86 source files

## Conventions

- There are no tests yet. An agent has no way to check its own work here.
- CI defines what passing means. See `.github/workflows/black-lint.yml`, and keep it green.
- TODO: add the two or three conventions a newcomer always gets wrong here.

## Gotchas

- `lcp/main.py` is 117KB. It will not fit comfortably in context, so read it in parts.
- No lockfile is committed, so an install here may not match what CI produced.

---

Drafted by agentreadme.com from what is in this repository. Everything marked TODO
needs a human. Check it in as AGENTS.md at the root.

Open the raw markdown  or  curl -o AGENTS.md agentreadme.com/draft/doocs/leetcode.md

Show the mark

The badge re-checks daily, so it keeps up as the repository changes. Use mark again to force it now.

agent ready 51 out of 100

[![agent ready](https://agentreadme.com/badge/doocs/leetcode.svg)](https://agentreadme.com/doocs/leetcode)

Other Java repositories, marked

krahets/hello-algo 37 D iluwatar/java-design-patterns 59 B- Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF 71 B+ macrozheng/mall 28 F spring-projects/spring-boot 42 C doocs/advanced-java 54 C+

All Java repositories

Think this mark is wrong?

Every deduction above names the file it came from, so this can be settled by looking. If a check missed something, that is a rule worth fixing.

Open an issue, already filled in