Report · marked 26 Aug 2026
Zie619/n8n-workflows
Solid foundations, held back in a few specific places.
Python · 56,279 stars · 2,178 files · branch main
72
/100
B+
Instructions
20/27Whether the repo tells an agent how to behave before it starts guessing. Losing marks on agent instruction file and instruction quality.Setup
15/20Whether an agent can install the project and get it running without a human. Losing marks on deterministic install and pinned runtime version.Verification loop
10/25Whether an agent can check its own work. This is the category that most decides whether agent output is trustworthy. Losing marks on tests exist and test command is discoverable.Context economy
19/20Whether the repo fits in a context window, or fights it. Losing marks on repository weight.Navigability
9/10How quickly anything new can orient itself. Losing marks on repository description.
Higher is better. Accent marks what is costing you most.
Fix these first
01
Test command is discoverable
Add a `test` script or a `test` target that runs the whole suite with no arguments. The convention is the interface — an agent tries `npm test` and `make test` before it tries reading your CI config.
02
Deterministic install
Commit the lockfile your package manager generates. Without it, an agent's install and your install are different builds, and 'works on my machine' becomes unfalsifiable.
03
Instruction quality
Worth fixing: it never states a build, test, or run command.
The full marking
Every deduction below names the file or setting it came from.
Instructions 20/27 B+
Whether the repo tells an agent how to behave before it starts guessing.
✗Agent instruction file
9/12
CLAUDE.md is present, but not the vendor-neutral AGENTS.md.
Rename or symlink to AGENTS.md so tools other than one vendor's can read it. Keeping CLAUDE.md alongside it costs nothing.
✗Instruction quality
8/12
Real instructions, with gaps.
Worth fixing: it never states a build, test, or run command.
4,683 characters, a workable length
uses headings, so an agent can skim it
includes copyable code blocks
✓README as an entry point
3/3
README has a clear getting-started section.
Setup 15/20 B+
Whether an agent can install the project and get it running without a human.
✗Deterministic install
3/6
Only requirements.txt, which pins loosely at best.
Commit the lockfile your package manager generates. Without it, an agent's install and your install are different builds, and 'works on my machine' becomes unfalsifiable.
✓Discoverable commands
6/6
Commands are declared where an agent will look for them.
scripts/ directory
✓Environment config
4/4
.env.example documents what the app needs to run.
✗Pinned runtime version
0/2
No pinned runtime version.
Add a .nvmrc, .python-version, or equivalent so the agent's toolchain matches yours.
✓Reproducible environment
2/2
.devcontainer/devcontainer.json gives a known-good environment.
Verification loop 10/25 C
Whether an agent can check its own work. This is the category that most decides whether agent output is trustworthy.
✗Tests exist
6/8
2 test files against 35 source files.
e.g. ai-stack/workflows/comfyui-simple-test.json, test_workflows.py
✗Test command is discoverable
0/7
There's no obvious way to run the tests. Even if tests exist, an agent won't reliably find the entry point.
Add a `test` script or a `test` target that runs the whole suite with no arguments. The convention is the interface — an agent tries `npm test` and `make test` before it tries reading your CI config.
✓Continuous integration
4/4
5 GitHub Actions workflows define what "passing" means.
✗Lint and format rules
0/3
No linter or formatter config. Style is tribal knowledge, so agent output will drift from yours.
A formatter config is the cheapest way to stop reviewing whitespace in agent diffs. It moves style from opinion to a command.
✗Static type checking
0/3
No static type checking.
A type checker gives an agent an error message instead of a runtime surprise. It's the second-fastest feedback loop after the compiler.
Context economy 19/20 A+
Whether the repo fits in a context window, or fights it.
✓No committed build output
6/6
No generated directories committed.
✓.gitignore hygiene
3/3
.gitignore covers 68 patterns.
✓File sizes fit in context
6/6
No source file is large enough to crowd out a context window.
✗Repository weight
4/5
About 52.5MB checked out, which is comfortable.
Here is your AGENTS.md
Drafted from what is actually in this repository: the install
command from your lockfile, the commands you already declare, your real directory layout. Anything
marked TODO needs a person. Save it at the root as AGENTS.md.
# AGENTS.md all of the workflows of n8n i could find (also from the site itself) ## Setup ``` pip install -r requirements.txt ``` ## Commands ``` # TODO: nothing declares a build or test command, so an agent has to guess. # This is the single most valuable section of this file. Fill it in. ``` ## Layout - `src/` 11 source files - `medcards-ai/` 7 source files - `scripts/` 6 source files - `docs/` 2 source files - `ai-stack/` 1 source file ## Conventions - Tests live alongside the code they cover, following `ai-stack/workflows/comfyui-simple-test.json`. - CI defines what passing means. See `.github/workflows/ci-cd.yml`, and keep it green. - TODO: add the two or three conventions a newcomer always gets wrong here. ## Gotchas - Copy `.env.example` before running anything that needs configuration. - No lockfile is committed, so an install here may not match what CI produced. --- Drafted by agentreadme.com from what is in this repository. Everything marked TODO needs a human. Check it in as AGENTS.md at the root.
Open the raw markdown
or
curl -o AGENTS.md agentreadme.com/draft/Zie619/n8n-workflows.md
Show the mark
The badge re-checks daily, so it keeps up as the repository changes. Use mark again to force it now.
[](https://agentreadme.com/Zie619/n8n-workflows)Other Python repositories, marked
Think this mark is wrong?
Every deduction above names the file it came from, so this can be settled by looking. If a check missed something, that is a rule worth fixing.