agentreadme

Report · marked 25 Aug 2026

justjavac/wechat-miniapp-radar

Ready for an agent to work in without hand-holding.

TypeScript · 51,185 stars · 179 files · branch main

Fix these first

01
Tests exist
Coverage is thin enough that an agent can break real behavior and still see green.
02
Lint and format rules
A formatter config is the cheapest way to stop reviewing whitespace in agent diffs. It moves style from opinion to a command.
03
Reproducible environment
A Dockerfile or devcontainer removes an entire class of 'it won't install' failures.

The full marking

Every deduction below names the file or setting it came from.

Instructions 26/27 A+

Whether the repo tells an agent how to behave before it starts guessing.

Agent instruction file 12/12
AGENTS.md is present, which is the format the most tools read.
Instruction quality 12/12
Specific enough that an agent can act on it.
3,574 characters, a workable length
names the actual commands to run
uses headings, so an agent can skim it
includes copyable code blocks
README as an entry point 2/3
README exists but never explains how to get the thing running.
Give the README an Install and a Usage heading with real commands under each. Agents pattern-match on those headings.
Setup 18/20 A

Whether an agent can install the project and get it running without a human.

Deterministic install 6/6
package-lock.json pins the dependency tree.
Found package-lock.json
Discoverable commands 6/6
Commands are declared where an agent will look for them.
package.json scripts (dev, build, start, integrations:verify, integrations-verify:test, generate…)
scripts/ directory
Environment config 4/4
.env.example documents what the app needs to run.
Pinned runtime version 2/2
The language runtime version is pinned.
package.json engines.node >=20
Reproducible environment 0/2
No container or devcontainer definition.
A Dockerfile or devcontainer removes an entire class of 'it won't install' failures.
Verification loop 18/25 B+

Whether an agent can check its own work. This is the category that most decides whether agent output is trustworthy.

Tests exist 4/8
1 test file against 142 source files.
Coverage is thin enough that an agent can break real behavior and still see green.
e.g. scripts/smoke-test.ts
Test command is discoverable 7/7
An agent can find and run `npm run check`.
Continuous integration 4/4
4 GitHub Actions workflows define what "passing" means.
Lint and format rules 0/3
No linter or formatter config. Style is tribal knowledge, so agent output will drift from yours.
A formatter config is the cheapest way to stop reviewing whitespace in agent diffs. It moves style from opinion to a command.
Static type checking 3/3
Strict type checking is on, which catches a whole class of agent mistakes before they run.
Context economy 20/20 A+

Whether the repo fits in a context window, or fights it.

No committed build output 6/6
No generated directories committed.
.gitignore hygiene 3/3
.gitignore covers 15 patterns.
File sizes fit in context 6/6
No source file is large enough to crowd out a context window.
Repository weight 5/5
About 1.4MB checked out, which is comfortable.

Here is your AGENTS.md

Drafted from what is actually in this repository: the install command from your lockfile, the commands you already declare, your real directory layout. Anything marked TODO needs a person. Save it at the root as AGENTS.md.

AGENTS.md — drafted for justjavac/wechat-miniapp-radar
undefined

Open the raw markdown  or  curl -o AGENTS.md agentreadme.com/draft/justjavac/wechat-miniapp-radar.md

Show the mark

The badge re-checks daily, so it keeps up as the repository changes. Use mark again to force it now.

agent ready 88 out of 100

[![agent ready](https://agentreadme.com/badge/justjavac/wechat-miniapp-radar.svg)](https://agentreadme.com/justjavac/wechat-miniapp-radar)

Other TypeScript repositories, marked

freeCodeCamp/freeCodeCamp 69 B openclaw/openclaw 68 B nilbuild/developer-roadmap 45 C vuejs/vue 67 B n8n-io/n8n 87 A anomalyco/opencode 80 A-

All TypeScript repositories

Think this mark is wrong?

Every deduction above names the file it came from, so this can be settled by looking. If a check missed something, that is a rule worth fixing.

Open an issue, already filled in