agentreadme

Report · marked 25 Aug 2026

jaywcjlove/linux-command

An agent is close to flying blind in this repository.

Markdown · 36,673 stars · 676 files · branch master

Fix these first

01
Agent instruction file
Add an AGENTS.md at the root: what the project is, how to install, how to run, how to test, and the two or three conventions a newcomer always gets wrong.
02
Instruction quality
Instructions earn their keep by naming exact commands. 'Run the tests with `pnpm test`' beats three paragraphs of philosophy.
03
Tests exist
This is the single highest-leverage change on this page. Agents don't need full coverage, they need one command that goes red when they break something. Even a handful of tests on the core path converts blind editing into a feedback loop.

The full marking

Every deduction below names the file or setting it came from.

Instructions 2/27 F

Whether the repo tells an agent how to behave before it starts guessing.

Agent instruction file 0/12
None found. Every agent that opens this repo starts from zero.
Add an AGENTS.md at the root: what the project is, how to install, how to run, how to test, and the two or three conventions a newcomer always gets wrong.
Looked for AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, .github/copilot-instructions.md, .cursorrules
Instruction quality 0/12
Nothing to judge, since there are no instructions.
Instructions earn their keep by naming exact commands. 'Run the tests with `pnpm test`' beats three paragraphs of philosophy.
README as an entry point 2/3
README exists but never explains how to get the thing running.
Give the README an Install and a Usage heading with real commands under each. Agents pattern-match on those headings.
Setup 10/20 C+

Whether an agent can install the project and get it running without a human.

Deterministic install 0/6
No lockfile. An agent installing dependencies may not get what CI got.
Commit the lockfile your package manager generates. Without it, an agent's install and your install are different builds, and 'works on my machine' becomes unfalsifiable.
Discoverable commands 6/6
Commands are declared where an agent will look for them.
package.json scripts (start, build, dash)
scripts/ directory
Environment config 0/4
Nothing documents the environment this needs. An agent will get a runtime error it can't diagnose.
Add a .env.example listing every variable with a safe placeholder value. It's the cheapest possible fix and it unblocks the whole first run.
Pinned runtime version 2/2
The language runtime version is pinned.
package.json engines.node >=16.0.0
Reproducible environment 2/2
dockerfile gives a known-good environment.
Verification loop 4/25 F

Whether an agent can check its own work. This is the category that most decides whether agent output is trustworthy.

Tests exist 0/8
No test files found. An agent has no way to know whether its change broke anything.
This is the single highest-leverage change on this page. Agents don't need full coverage, they need one command that goes red when they break something. Even a handful of tests on the core path converts blind editing into a feedback loop.
Test command is discoverable 0/7
There's no obvious way to run the tests. Even if tests exist, an agent won't reliably find the entry point.
Add a `test` script or a `test` target that runs the whole suite with no arguments. The convention is the interface — an agent tries `npm test` and `make test` before it tries reading your CI config.
Continuous integration 4/4
1 GitHub Actions workflow define what "passing" means.
Lint and format rules 0/3
No linter or formatter config. Style is tribal knowledge, so agent output will drift from yours.
A formatter config is the cheapest way to stop reviewing whitespace in agent diffs. It moves style from opinion to a command.
Static type checking 0/3
No static type checking.
A type checker gives an agent an error message instead of a runtime surprise. It's the second-fastest feedback loop after the compiler.
Context economy 15/20 B+

Whether the repo fits in a context window, or fights it.

No committed build output 6/6
No generated directories committed.
.gitignore hygiene 3/3
.gitignore covers 5 patterns.
File sizes fit in context 6/6
No source file is large enough to crowd out a context window.
Repository weight 0/5
About 4267MB checked out. Large enough that cloning and searching are both slow.
Large binaries and vendored trees slow every operation an agent performs. Git LFS or a separate assets repo keeps the working tree navigable.

Here is your AGENTS.md

Drafted from what is actually in this repository: the install command from your lockfile, the commands you already declare, your real directory layout. Anything marked TODO needs a person. Save it at the root as AGENTS.md.

AGENTS.md — drafted for jaywcjlove/linux-command
# AGENTS.md

Linux命令大全搜索工具,内容包含Linux命令手册、详解、学习、搜集。https://git.io/linux

## Setup

```
npm install
```

## Commands

```
npm run start   # run the app
npm run build   # produce a build
npm run dash
```

## Layout

- `scripts/`  3 source files
- `template/` 2 source files

## Conventions

- There are no tests yet. An agent has no way to check its own work here.
- CI defines what passing means. See `.github/workflows/ci.yml`, and keep it green.
- TODO: add the two or three conventions a newcomer always gets wrong here.

## Gotchas

- Generated output is committed (`dist/`). Search will return the compiled copy, so edit the source, not that.
- No lockfile is committed, so an install here may not match what CI produced.

---

Drafted by agentreadme.com from what is in this repository. Everything marked TODO
needs a human. Check it in as AGENTS.md at the root.

Open the raw markdown  or  curl -o AGENTS.md agentreadme.com/draft/jaywcjlove/linux-command.md

Show the mark

The badge re-checks daily, so it keeps up as the repository changes. Use mark again to force it now.

agent ready 38 out of 100

[![agent ready](https://agentreadme.com/badge/jaywcjlove/linux-command.svg)](https://agentreadme.com/jaywcjlove/linux-command)

Other Markdown repositories, marked

tldr-pages/tldr 88 A

All Markdown repositories

Think this mark is wrong?

Every deduction above names the file it came from, so this can be settled by looking. If a check missed something, that is a rule worth fixing.

Open an issue, already filled in