Report · marked 25 Aug 2026
chrislgarry/Apollo-11
An agent will struggle here, mostly for fixable reasons.
Assembly · 72,175 stars · 262 files · branch master
44
/100
C
Instructions
2/27Whether the repo tells an agent how to behave before it starts guessing. Losing marks on agent instruction file and instruction quality.Setup
12/14Whether an agent can install the project and get it running without a human. Losing marks on pinned runtime version.Verification loop
4/25Whether an agent can check its own work. This is the category that most decides whether agent output is trustworthy. Losing marks on tests exist and test command is discoverable.Context economy
19/20Whether the repo fits in a context window, or fights it. Losing marks on .gitignore hygiene.Navigability
5/10How quickly anything new can orient itself. Losing marks on written documentation and license.
Higher is better. Accent marks what is costing you most.
Fix these first
01
Agent instruction file
Add an AGENTS.md at the root: what the project is, how to install, how to run, how to test, and the two or three conventions a newcomer always gets wrong.
02
Instruction quality
Instructions earn their keep by naming exact commands. 'Run the tests with `pnpm test`' beats three paragraphs of philosophy.
03
Tests exist
This is the single highest-leverage change on this page. Agents don't need full coverage, they need one command that goes red when they break something. Even a handful of tests on the core path converts blind editing into a feedback loop.
The full marking
Every deduction below names the file or setting it came from.
Instructions 2/27 F
Whether the repo tells an agent how to behave before it starts guessing.
✗Agent instruction file
0/12
None found. Every agent that opens this repo starts from zero.
Add an AGENTS.md at the root: what the project is, how to install, how to run, how to test, and the two or three conventions a newcomer always gets wrong.
Looked for AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, .github/copilot-instructions.md, .cursorrules
✗Instruction quality
0/12
Nothing to judge, since there are no instructions.
Instructions earn their keep by naming exact commands. 'Run the tests with `pnpm test`' beats three paragraphs of philosophy.
✗README as an entry point
2/3
README exists but never explains how to get the thing running.
Give the README an Install and a Usage heading with real commands under each. Agents pattern-match on those headings.
Setup 12/14 A
Whether an agent can install the project and get it running without a human.
✓Deterministic install
6/6
bun.lockb pins the dependency tree.
Found bun.lockb
✓Discoverable commands
6/6
Commands are declared where an agent will look for them.
package.json scripts (lint, lint:fix)
–Environment config
n/a
Not applicable — this reads as a library, with no environment to configure.
✗Pinned runtime version
0/2
No pinned runtime version.
Add a .nvmrc, .python-version, or equivalent so the agent's toolchain matches yours.
–Reproducible environment
n/a
Not applicable — a library doesn't need a container to be worked on.
Verification loop 4/25 F
Whether an agent can check its own work. This is the category that most decides whether agent output is trustworthy.
✗Tests exist
0/8
No test files found. An agent has no way to know whether its change broke anything.
This is the single highest-leverage change on this page. Agents don't need full coverage, they need one command that goes red when they break something. Even a handful of tests on the core path converts blind editing into a feedback loop.
✗Test command is discoverable
0/7
There's no obvious way to run the tests. Even if tests exist, an agent won't reliably find the entry point.
Add a `test` script or a `test` target that runs the whole suite with no arguments. The convention is the interface — an agent tries `npm test` and `make test` before it tries reading your CI config.
✓Continuous integration
4/4
2 GitHub Actions workflows define what "passing" means.
✗Lint and format rules
0/3
No linter or formatter config. Style is tribal knowledge, so agent output will drift from yours.
A formatter config is the cheapest way to stop reviewing whitespace in agent diffs. It moves style from opinion to a command.
✗Static type checking
0/3
No static type checking.
A type checker gives an agent an error message instead of a runtime surprise. It's the second-fastest feedback loop after the compiler.
Context economy 19/20 A+
Whether the repo fits in a context window, or fights it.
✓No committed build output
6/6
No generated directories committed.
✗.gitignore hygiene
2/3
.gitignore has only 2 rules.
Start from a standard template for your stack. It prevents the previous problem before it happens.
✓File sizes fit in context
6/6
No source file is large enough to crowd out a context window.
✓Repository weight
5/5
About 3.1MB checked out, which is comfortable.
Here is your AGENTS.md
Drafted from what is actually in this repository: the install
command from your lockfile, the commands you already declare, your real directory layout. Anything
marked TODO needs a person. Save it at the root as AGENTS.md.
# AGENTS.md Original Apollo 11 Guidance Computer (AGC) source code for the command and lunar modules. ## Setup ``` bun install ``` ## Commands ``` bun lint # lint bun lint:fix ``` ## Layout - `Luminary099/` 91 source files - `Comanche055/` 86 source files - `Translations/` 69 source files ## Conventions - There are no tests yet. An agent has no way to check its own work here. - CI defines what passing means. See `.github/workflows/label.yml`, and keep it green. - TODO: add the two or three conventions a newcomer always gets wrong here. --- Drafted by agentreadme.com from what is in this repository. Everything marked TODO needs a human. Check it in as AGENTS.md at the root.
Open the raw markdown
or
curl -o AGENTS.md agentreadme.com/draft/chrislgarry/Apollo-11.md
Show the mark
The badge re-checks daily, so it keeps up as the repository changes. Use mark again to force it now.
[](https://agentreadme.com/chrislgarry/Apollo-11)Think this mark is wrong?
Every deduction above names the file it came from, so this can be settled by looking. If a check missed something, that is a rule worth fixing.