agentreadme

Report · marked 25 Aug 2026

ChromeDevTools/chrome-devtools-mcp

Ready for an agent to work in without hand-holding.

TypeScript · 49,700 stars · 291 files · branch main

Fix these first

01
Environment config
Add a .env.example listing every variable with a safe placeholder value. It's the cheapest possible fix and it unblocks the whole first run.
02
Instruction quality
Worth fixing: has no code blocks.
03
Reproducible environment
A Dockerfile or devcontainer removes an entire class of 'it won't install' failures.

The full marking

Every deduction below names the file or setting it came from.

Instructions 25/27 A+

Whether the repo tells an agent how to behave before it starts guessing.

Agent instruction file 12/12
AGENTS.md is present, which is the format the most tools read.
Instruction quality 10/12
Specific enough that an agent can act on it.
Worth fixing: has no code blocks.
901 characters, a workable length
names the actual commands to run
uses headings, so an agent can skim it
README as an entry point 3/3
README has a clear getting-started section.
Setup 16/20 A-

Whether an agent can install the project and get it running without a human.

Deterministic install 6/6
package-lock.json pins the dependency tree.
Found package-lock.json
Discoverable commands 6/6
Commands are declared where an agent will look for them.
package.json scripts (cli:generate, clean, bundle, build, typecheck, format…)
scripts/ directory
Environment config 2/4
Env vars are mentioned in the README but there's no example file to copy.
Add a .env.example listing every variable with a safe placeholder value. It's the cheapest possible fix and it unblocks the whole first run.
Pinned runtime version 2/2
The language runtime version is pinned.
Found .nvmrc
Reproducible environment 0/2
No container or devcontainer definition.
A Dockerfile or devcontainer removes an entire class of 'it won't install' failures.
Verification loop 24/25 A+

Whether an agent can check its own work. This is the category that most decides whether agent output is trustworthy.

Tests exist 8/8
124 test files against 195 source files.
e.g. scripts/eval_scenarios/console_test.ts, scripts/eval_scenarios/emulation_test.ts, scripts/eval_scenarios/emulation_userAgent_test.ts
Test command is discoverable 7/7
An agent can find and run `npm run test`.
Continuous integration 4/4
8 GitHub Actions workflows define what "passing" means.
Lint and format rules 3/3
eslint.config.js encodes the house style.
Static type checking 2/3
Type checking is configured, but not in strict mode.
Turn on `"strict": true`. Type errors are the fastest feedback an agent gets, and non-strict mode silently discards most of them.
Context economy 20/20 A+

Whether the repo fits in a context window, or fights it.

No committed build output 6/6
No generated directories committed.
.gitignore hygiene 3/3
.gitignore covers 71 patterns.
File sizes fit in context 6/6
No source file is large enough to crowd out a context window.
Repository weight 5/5
About 10.6MB checked out, which is comfortable.

Here is your AGENTS.md

Drafted from what is actually in this repository: the install command from your lockfile, the commands you already declare, your real directory layout. Anything marked TODO needs a person. Save it at the root as AGENTS.md.

AGENTS.md — drafted for ChromeDevTools/chrome-devtools-mcp
undefined

Open the raw markdown  or  curl -o AGENTS.md agentreadme.com/draft/ChromeDevTools/chrome-devtools-mcp.md

Show the mark

The badge re-checks daily, so it keeps up as the repository changes. Use mark again to force it now.

agent ready 93 out of 100

[![agent ready](https://agentreadme.com/badge/ChromeDevTools/chrome-devtools-mcp.svg)](https://agentreadme.com/ChromeDevTools/chrome-devtools-mcp)

Other TypeScript repositories, marked

freeCodeCamp/freeCodeCamp 69 B openclaw/openclaw 68 B nilbuild/developer-roadmap 45 C vuejs/vue 67 B n8n-io/n8n 87 A anomalyco/opencode 80 A-

All TypeScript repositories

Think this mark is wrong?

Every deduction above names the file it came from, so this can be settled by looking. If a check missed something, that is a rule worth fixing.

Open an issue, already filled in